To: Arthur Caplan, Director of the Center for Bioethics, University of Pennsylvania
From: A.C. Green, President, A.C. Green Youth Foundation (www.acgreen.com)
Arthur,
I read your recent commentary on abstinence education (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/18136717), and I must admit, I was very disappointed.
"So what," you may say, wondering why you should listen to a retired NBA player with no Ph.D. I suppose that’s a fair question. But as the founder of a national abstinence organization, and as a husband who married his wife as a virgin (at the age of 38), I ask that you thoughtfully consider my response.
The opinions you put forth may be popular in academia; however, history has certainly taught us that popular ideas are often wrong. Therefore, I think we can agree that the evidence – and the truth – should dictate our conclusion.
You refer to a study that tracked four elementary and middle school programs. Considering that approximately 700 abstinence programs receive federal funding, it can hardly be considered a comprehensive study.
A few other interesting tidbits that you didn’t mention about the programs reviewed:
- the evaluation begin in 1999
- all four of those programs have since been revised and improved
- they have no high school component
Most of us could easily determine – even without a doctorate degree – that sex education is probably most effective when it continues into the high school years of students.
It seems clear that you have placed a great deal of significance on this one study. I wonder if you would be willing to place equal importance on the more than 20 other studies that show abstinence programs are making a positive difference in the lives of youth?
Arthur, the title of your article reads, “Blind faith on sex-ed approach puts kids at risk.”
I couldn’t agree more! Let’s examine the facts about sex.
Medicine tells us that sexually transmitted disease is avoided by having one partner for life. Social science tells us that the earlier a teenage girl begins sexual activity the more likely she is to suffer from increased rates of infection with sexually transmitted diseases, increased rates of out-of-wedlock pregnancy and birth, increased rates of single parenthood, decreased marital stability, increased maternal and child poverty, increased abortion, increased depression, and decreased adult happiness (Heritage Foundation). And history tells us that abstinence used to be expected. According to the National Survey of Family Growth, abstinence was the norm among unmarried American teenage girls at least until 1982. Is that when we started telling ourselves it wasn’t realistic?
In a previous article, you touted the statistic that 45 percent of
Our kids are begging for more information on abstinence. A survey of 1,000 girls conducted by
You and I certainly agree that STDs are spreading at an alarming rate. That’s not all. Except for a pause in the early 1980s, pregnancy rates for 15-19 year olds have risen over the last 25 years to the present high of 111 pregnancies for every thousand girls. This is not due to a lack of knowledge about contraception and “safe” sex! The U.S. Food and Drug Administration found that in typical use for just
You argue against the effectiveness of abstinence, yet it is 100% reliable. You say we can’t expect teenagers to be abstinent, yet I made it through adolescence (and 16 NBA seasons!) unscathed. My Foundation has worked with many young men and women who have chosen abstinence. Others have recommitted themselves to abstinence after experiencing firsthand the pain that results from sex outside of marriage.
You claim that this one study shows abstinence programs are ineffective, and yet there are currently dozens of evaluations showing that abstinence education is effective in reducing teen sexual activity.
You say that abstinence education doesn’t make a difference, and yet, according to the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, young women who take a virginity pledge are approximately 40 percent less likely to have a child out-of-wedlock when compared to similar young women who do not make pledges.
You imply that abstinence programs fail to discuss STDs and contraception. Not only do abstinence programs address these topics, they do so accurately, explaining the truth about so-called “safe sex” and helping teens understand that their decisions have consequences.
You bemoan the money spent on abstinence education, but according to the Heritage Foundation, the government spends $12 to promote contraceptives for every $1 spent on abstinence.
Simply put, Arthur, you are wrong. Abstinence until marriage is the best decision physically, emotionally, socially and intellectually. That is the truth. To justify your viewpoint by suggesting kids can’t choose to be abstinent is to portray our children as little more than animals with uncontrollable urges. Boys and girls who can’t learn to choose the best for their future. Perhaps that is how you see
In fact, we all have a choice to make. I choose the truth.
A.C. Green established the A.C. Green Youth Foundation in 1989 (www.acgreen.com), with the main focus on sexual abstinence education. The Foundation's mission is to help young people build self-esteem and character, and learn moral and ethical principles which will help them make responsible decisions. A.C. currently owns the NBA Iron Man title, having played in 1,192 straight games during his 16 year career.
Statistics taken from:
Heritage Foundation: http://www.heritage.org/Research/Welfare/wm461.cfm
ClubAC.com: http://www.acgreen.com/abstinence/statistics.html
A.C. Green’s Game Plan abstinence workbook
Family Research Council: http://www.frc.org/get.cfm?i=WU07D09
No comments:
Post a Comment